Classic Cinema Review: Scarface (1932) Movie Review

Scarface Pre-Code Cinema review

Howard Hawks’ gangland epic Scarface is a particularly gritty, nasty, mean-spirited gangster flick. It remains a high point of Pre-Code Cinema – genuinely startling in its intense violence and bizarre, unsavory relationships.

Filmgoers tend to go into films from the 1930s expecting a certain cozy quaintness, perhaps expecting some Shirley Temple cuteness or Marx Brothers hijinks. The films of the early 1930s are a much different, more vicious breed, however. Film-makers were desperate to capture the fascination of audiences using every gimmick at their disposal, as the newly invented “talkies” left movie lovers hungry for innovation.

Like any business, Hollywood’s first response was to create controversy. Movies released before the Hays Code was enforced in earnest in 1934 are a carnival of vice. Drug addiction, wanton sex, alcoholism, unwanted pregnancy, abortion, homosexuality, and intense violence were all too common. You’d even seen your occasional incest, as evident in a bizarre subtext of 1932’s Scarface, which we’ll be discussing in-depth.

The films of the early 1930s are a bridge between the innocence of Early Cinema and the later cynicism of Film Noir. Ironically, the Hays Code played a large part in the creation of that genre, as film-makers had to get savvy and tricky to get around the censors.

Scarface exists in the intersection between these two distinct eras. The non-stop depictions of violence are particularly gritty and realistic, even by today’s standards. This isn’t your usual cinematic action, where a cowboy simply falls from his horse like a cardboard cutout when shot. Instead, the gangsters of Scarface are cut down in a hail of hot lead, reaching for the bullets like a swarm of angry hornets. While censors may have been worried these films were romanticizing violence and criminal behavior, Scarface seems anything but romantic. Instead, these are hard, fast, desperate lives, wedded to the gun and holster.

Let’s take a closer look at 1932’s Scarface.

Scarface Pre-Code Cinema review

Scarface (1932) Movie Review

Scarface is considered the last of a triptych of legendary Gangster Movies, alongside Little Caesar and Public Enemy. It’s also the grittiest and most violent, which would tangle the film up in legal complications for 2 years, even before the Hays Code was being enforced in earnest.

Scarface Plot Synopsis

Scarface tells the story of Tony “Scarface” Camonte, played with fervor by Paul Muni, a fictionalized depiction of fearsome Chicago gangster Al Capone. It starts off with Camonte taking out the competition, gunning down Big Louie Costello, the last of the old-world Italian mobsters. With a sudden vacuum in the power balance of Prohibition-era Chicago, Camonte and his new boss Johnny Lovo move in to take over Costello’s action.

Scarface wastes no time in getting to the shooting, but we meet the rest of a memorable cast of characters at the same time. There’s Cesca, played by Ann Dvorak, Camonte’s sister, who he has a particularly protective streak towards. Tony catches her kissing a fella and throws the poor boy out into the street. It’s unclear if Camonte’s just playing the old-world protective patriarch or if there’s a little more to it, just to add to the moral ambiguity of the film.

Ann Dvorak Scarface
Paul Muni and Ann Dvorak as Tony and Cesca Camonte, a brother and sister with a bizarrely close relationship

We also meet Poppy, played by the under-appreciated bombshell Karen Morley, who is lovers with Johnny Lovo at the time. We’ll quickly learn that Poppy’s loyalty is less-than-reliable. As is Tony’s, as he begins to double-cross Johnny Lovo while still serving as his right-hand man.

Lovo and his gang already own the South Side. A mobster named O’Hara owns the North Side and Lovo forbids Camonte from making moves into O’Hara’s territory. Camonte ignores this advice, kick-starting a gang war that sends the public into a panic.

Karen Morley Classic Cinema review
Karen Morley as Poppy, a stone-cold Gangster moll

The introduction of Tommy Guns changes the game completely. Camonte finally has the tools he needs to make his move, and the streets of Chicago run red with blood and beer.

Johnny Lovo loses his status as Camonte moves into to seize the power, as the most ruthless, violent gangster the city had ever seen. Poppy finally succumbs to Camonte’s persistent advances, but it’s a little too late at that point.

Camonte orders Johnny Lovo gunned down by Guino, the archetypal coin-flipping movie gangster played by George Raft. Camonte and Poppy pick up stakes and head to Florida to let things cool down. His undoing would be waiting for them immediately upon their return.

While Camonte was in hiding, Cesca makes her intentions clear towards Guino, whom she’s been flirting with throughout the duration of the film. Camonte returns to find his sister gone, living in a small apartment with Guino. Furious, Camonte busts in on the happy couple and cuts down Guino, one of his last friends, in cold blood. It turns out Guino had made an honest woman of Cesca, as the pair had been married just the day before. Destroyed, half-mad, Cesca lays into Tony, calling him a butcher and a murderer.

This mis-step would prove to be Tony’s undoing. The cops catch wind of Guino’s murder and send a squad to Camonte’s bulletproof lair. It turns out to not be bulletproof enough, and the film’s final moments finds Camonte alone and afraid, having lost everything he loved and held dear. He died, as he lived, by the Tommy Gun.

Scarface '30s movie review
The World Is Yours; Paul Muni and Karen Morley in Scarface

Scarface‘s Critical Reception

Even in the years before the Hays Code was being enforced in earnest, Scarface managed to scandalize very nearly everybody. First of all and unsurprisingly, the usual keepers of morality, the Church and concerned citizens groups, protested the film. Both Irish and Italian groups felt the film cast immigrants in a negative light. 

Scarface actually holds to certain tenets of post-Code Hollywood, even if they didn’t need to. Most notably, wrong-doers are punished, which prevents Scarface from feeling like its glamorizing the Gangster lifestyle. Some of these changes were forced, as well, however, as the film underwent extensive reconfiguration over the span of 2 years to please the censors.

This additional material comes largely in the form of a few newsroom scenes, where outraged reporters froth about what this country’s coming to. The exposition is rather heavy-handed, but is salvaged with some passionate delivery by the head reporter.

Given the concern over the depiction of immigrants in Scarface, it’s slightly ironic that the film is one of the least whitewashed, Americanized gangster films out there. The characters are clearly Italian, complete with accents and everything. Never succumbing to stereotypes, Scarface depicts the real struggles of Italian-Americans, complete with some realistic characters, like Tony and Cesca’s mother, who adds even more moral condemnation on the film’s proceedings.

Scarface Final Thoughts

Scarface was ready to be released in 1930, you must remember. This means the United States was reeling from the Great Depression and from the memories of The Great War, aka World War I. Films of this era reflect this loss of innocence and cynicism in a way that would finally blossom into the Flower Of Evil that is Film Noir.

Scarface also reflects this moral universe using strong, striking contrast in the black-and-white film. It can be read as a kind of proto-Film Noir, but is even uglier and more malevolent than that genre, which had to rely on shadows and subtlety to deliver its moral worldview.

Scarface also benefits from some of that era’s more adventurous film-making techniques. Certain moments seem cribbed from the German Expressionist playbook, with weird, cock-eyed angles reflecting an unhinged worldview. All of the technical niceties are nice and all, but they’re mainly setting and stage-dressing for insanely strong performances. Paul Muni is beyond belief as Scarface, who manages to be simultaneously hideous and likable, sometimes in the same scene. The women are strong and sure of themselves, even if they do succumb to the men’s authority. It was still the early ’30s, after all, and the Suffragette movement was still getting going, especially here in the states.

For all of its moralizing, Scarface doesn’t preach. Instead, it tells a tale. It follows deep, intriguing characters as they follow their passions for power and money. Unsurprisingly, they get what they sow. You’re left not really knowing how to feel, which is truly the mark of a thought-provoking, masterful film.

Scarface was screened as the first installment of the Putting The Sin In Cinema series at Cinema 21 in Portland, Or. in conjunction with Oregon State University. The film was screened, and a fascinating follow-up conversation was had with film instructor/programmer/analyst Elliot Lavine.

There’s still 9 weeks of the course left, so it’s not too late if you’d like to join in with some fellow Portland movie fanatics. You can find tickets and register via OSU.

Next week we’ll be taking a look at Three On A Match, also from 1932. Check back next Tuesday for more classic Hollywood movie reviews!

Want More Portland Movie Reviews?

Looking for more movie news, reviews, thoughts, and insights? Follow @for3stpunk on Twitter, Instagram, and Letterboxd!

Want to support quality, in-depth film criticism? Every donation allows us to comment more fully on the world we’re living in.

Putting The Sin in Cinema: 10-Week Course On Pre-Code Hollywood Starts Tomorrow at Cinema 21 in Portland, Or.

Your average film-goer might think of old movies as “boring,” “safe,” “campy,” “schmaltzy” etc. Old black-and-white films portray a moral universe, where good deeds are rewards, the wicked are punished, the hero gets the girl, and it all ends with a somewhat chaste kiss.

Hollywood Babylon Hays Code
Hollywood Babylon: The Documentary

Hollywood was not always like this. It’s no mistake that Kenneth Anger described Old Hollywood as Hollywood Babylon. In the brief window between the advent of the “talkies” and before the Motion Picture Production Code, commonly known as the Hays Code, was enforced in earnest in 1934, film-makers would use any trick at their disposal to put the bodies in the seats.

The cinema of the late ’20s and early ’30s depicts a cynical, gritty realism that’s a far cry from the Bugsby Berkeley musicals, tame romances, and over-the-top melodrama commonly associated with “old movies.”

This era, known as “Pre-Code Hollywood”, is seeped in a sordid worldview of strong-but-damaged heroines, down-on-their-luck gamblers, hardened gangsters, as well as an ever-present entourage of prostitutes, junkies, homosexuals, depicting edgy topics like infidelity, abortion, promiscuity, and intense violence.

 

Putting The Sin in Cinema and Pre-Code Hollywood

Pre-Code Hollywood is the theme for a new course being offered by Oregon State University as part of their Professional and Continuing Education program. Putting The Sin in Cinema is a 10-week course being held at Cinema 21 in Northwest Portland. Films will be screened at 11:00 am on Tuesday mornings.

Elliot Lavine film studies
Professor Elliot Lavine

Putting The Sin in Cinema is being taught by Oregon State University professor Elliot Lavine. Lavine rose to prominence in the Bay Area of the early ’90s, where he detoured from his burgeoning film career to discover his true calling as a film programmer, scholar, and critic. Elliot Lavine played a pivotal role in the re-discovery of Film Noir as a valid genre, before turning his keen eyes on other fascinating topics like sci-fi films of the 1950s.

Lavine pulled up stakes from his Bay Area home to live beneath our fair gray skies here in Portland, Or. He’s so beloved he gets articles written about him when he moved. Elliot Lavine received the prestigious Marlon Riggs Award from the San Francisco Film Critics Circle for his revival of rare archival titles in 2010. He’s also taught Film Studies at Stanford’s Continuing Studies Program since 2006.

It’s been said of Elliot Lavine that he’s “to movies what a feng shui master is to furniture. The master doesn’t make the furniture but knows where to place it in considered relationship with the other pieces — and what the combinations will mean. This philosophical approach to film has always been part of who he is, even decades before he had a theatre to program.” It’s also been said he’s a born advocate for the neglected and underappreciated.”

It’s beyond exciting to speculate what Levine’s subtle, nuanced analysis and appreciation of lesser-known historical curiosities will bring to this fascinating 10-week series.

Pre-Code Hollywood movies will be shown, in full, at 11:00 am on Tuesday mornings at Century 21. It’s definitely a course for the hardcore cinephile, as you have to audit the whole course and individual tickets are not available. So excited to see this independently-owned-and-operated theater transform into a makeshift Film Studies classroom for ten weeks.

Three On A Match 1932

The movies that will be screened as part of Putting The Sin in Cinema are:

  1. Scarface (1932; Howard Hawks)
  2. Three on a Match (1932; Mervyn LeRoy)
  3. Baby Face (1933; Alfred Green)
  4. Island of Lost Souls (1932; Erle C. Kenton)
  5. Safe in Hell (1931; William Wellman)
  6. Red-Headed Woman (1932; Jack Conway)
  7. The Cheat (1931; George Abbott)
  8. Downstairs (1932; Monta Bell)
  9. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931; Rouben Mamoulian)
  10. Footlight Parade (1933; Lloyd Bacon)

It is our distinct pleasure to be able to take this course with Elliot Lavine and some of Portland’s diehard movie fanatics. We’ll be covering the series as it goes on, so make sure to watch this space for news, reviews, thoughts, ramblings, etc.

You can sign up for Putting The Sin in Cinema via OSU. Lavine is also teaching a course on Saturday mornings on Film Noir in the 1950s. You can find tickets for The Grit and the Glamour over here.

Want More Portland Movie News & Reviews?

Looking for more movie news, reviews, thoughts, and insights? Follow @for3stpunk on Twitter, Instagram, and Letterboxd!

Want to support quality, in-depth film criticism? Every donation allows us to comment more fully on the world we’re living in.